Re: [PATCH] perf, tools: Add library dependencies for static perf link

2012-10-01 Thread Andi Kleen
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 06:07:09PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > This is superfluous, because FLAGS_BFD has -ldl already by your change > > above. This is cascaded downwards. > > I tried to remove it, but that makes it not link again for the static build. > Haven't looked into the causes. Ok looki

Re: [PATCH] perf, tools: Add library dependencies for static perf link

2012-09-30 Thread Andi Kleen
> This is superfluous, because FLAGS_BFD has -ldl already by your change > above. This is cascaded downwards. I tried to remove it, but that makes it not link again for the static build. Haven't looked into the causes. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kerne

Re: [PATCH] perf, tools: Add library dependencies for static perf link

2012-09-29 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2012.09.29 at 11:13 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > From: Andi Kleen > > When linking perf statically some of the library dependencies are always > rejected, so libdwarf and libbfd do not work. The problem is that these > libraries (at least on my system) require other libraries. But unlike > a sh

[PATCH] perf, tools: Add library dependencies for static perf link

2012-09-29 Thread Andi Kleen
From: Andi Kleen When linking perf statically some of the library dependencies are always rejected, so libdwarf and libbfd do not work. The problem is that these libraries (at least on my system) require other libraries. But unlike a shared link the static link doesn't find those by itself, and