On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 8:23 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 01/22/2016 09:53 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:58:26PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Cao jin
>>> wrote:
Hi,
IMHO, I think maybe modification on
On 01/22/2016 09:53 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:58:26PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Cao jin wrote:
Hi,
IMHO, I think maybe modification on i801_smbus driver is easier.
Because when i801_smbus request_irq using pci_dev->ir
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:58:26PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Cao jin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > IMHO, I think maybe modification on i801_smbus driver is easier.
> >
> > Because when i801_smbus request_irq using pci_dev->irq, this
> > pci_dev->irq seems
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Cao jin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMHO, I think maybe modification on i801_smbus driver is easier.
>
> Because when i801_smbus request_irq using pci_dev->irq, this
> pci_dev->irq seems still holds the value read from register(
> pci_setup_device->pci_read_irq), if t
Hi,
IMHO, I think maybe modification on i801_smbus driver is easier.
Because when i801_smbus request_irq using pci_dev->irq, this
pci_dev->irq seems still holds the value read from register(
pci_setup_device->pci_read_irq), if the value is 255, it is invalid in
register, but when requ
On 01/21/2016 01:12 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:21:24PM +0800, Chen Fan wrote:
On 01/20/2016 08:24 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
[+cc Jiang]
Hi Chen,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 02:43:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 09:45:13 AM Chen Fan wrote
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:21:24PM +0800, Chen Fan wrote:
>
> On 01/20/2016 08:24 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >[+cc Jiang]
> >
> >Hi Chen,
> >
> >On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 02:43:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 09:45:13 AM Chen Fan wrote:
> >>>In our environment,
7 matches
Mail list logo