Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:17:37 +0400 Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PCI memory space may have a 64-bit offset on some architectures
(for example, PowerPC 440) and the actual PCI memory address
has to fixed up (an offset to PCI mem space shuld be added)
before re
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:17:37 +0400 Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PCI memory space may have a 64-bit offset on some architectures
> (for example, PowerPC 440) and the actual PCI memory address
> has to fixed up (an offset to PCI mem space shuld be added)
> before remapping. So, pci
PCI memory space may have a 64-bit offset on some architectures
(for example, PowerPC 440) and the actual PCI memory address
has to fixed up (an offset to PCI mem space shuld be added)
before remapping. So, pci_iomap should be used instead of
reading and remapping PCI BAR directly. This has been te
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 18-09-2007 13:17, Valentine Barshak wrote:
PCI memory space may have a 64-bit offset on some architectures
(for example, PowerPC 440) and the actual PCI memory address
has to fixed up (an offset to PCI mem space shuld be added)
before remapping. So, pci_iomap should be
On 18-09-2007 13:17, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> PCI memory space may have a 64-bit offset on some architectures
> (for example, PowerPC 440) and the actual PCI memory address
> has to fixed up (an offset to PCI mem space shuld be added)
> before remapping. So, pci_iomap should be used instead of
>
PCI memory space may have a 64-bit offset on some architectures
(for example, PowerPC 440) and the actual PCI memory address
has to fixed up (an offset to PCI mem space shuld be added)
before remapping. So, pci_iomap should be used instead of
reading and remapping PCI BAR directly. This has been te
6 matches
Mail list logo
