On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 06:44:27PM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote:
>
> On 8/4/20 6:03 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 04/08/2020 10:58, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >> Hi Bingbu,
> >>
> >> Thank you for the patch.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 05:13:56PM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote:
> >>> nvmem_
On 8/4/20 6:03 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>
>
> On 04/08/2020 10:58, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>> Hi Bingbu,
>>
>> Thank you for the patch.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 05:13:56PM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote:
>>> nvmem_device_read() could be called directly once nvmem device
>>> registered, the sani
On 04/08/2020 10:58, Sakari Ailus wrote:
Hi Bingbu,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 05:13:56PM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote:
nvmem_device_read() could be called directly once nvmem device
registered, the sanity check should be done before call
nvmem_reg_read() as cell and sysfs
Hi Bingbu,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 05:13:56PM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote:
> nvmem_device_read() could be called directly once nvmem device
> registered, the sanity check should be done before call
> nvmem_reg_read() as cell and sysfs read did now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bingbu
nvmem_device_read() could be called directly once nvmem device
registered, the sanity check should be done before call
nvmem_reg_read() as cell and sysfs read did now.
Signed-off-by: Bingbu Cao
---
drivers/nvmem/core.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core
5 matches
Mail list logo