On 07/06/2024 00:49, Ira Weiny wrote:
> Li Zhijian wrote:
>> Don't allocate devs again when it's valid pointer which has pionted to
>> the memory allocated above with size (count + 2 * sizeof(dev)).
>>
>> A kmemleak reports:
>> unreferenced object 0x88800dda1980 (size 16):
>>comm "kworker
On 07/06/2024 00:27, Dave Jiang wrote:
>
>
> On 6/3/24 8:16 PM, Li Zhijian wrote:
>> Don't allocate devs again when it's valid pointer which has pionted to
>> the memory allocated above with size (count + 2 * sizeof(dev)).
>>
>> A kmemleak reports:
>> unreferenced object 0x88800dda1980 (siz
Li Zhijian wrote:
> Don't allocate devs again when it's valid pointer which has pionted to
> the memory allocated above with size (count + 2 * sizeof(dev)).
>
> A kmemleak reports:
> unreferenced object 0x88800dda1980 (size 16):
> comm "kworker/u10:5", pid 69, jiffies 4294671781
> hex dump
On 6/3/24 8:16 PM, Li Zhijian wrote:
> Don't allocate devs again when it's valid pointer which has pionted to
> the memory allocated above with size (count + 2 * sizeof(dev)).
>
> A kmemleak reports:
> unreferenced object 0x88800dda1980 (size 16):
> comm "kworker/u10:5", pid 69, jiffies 4
Don't allocate devs again when it's valid pointer which has pionted to
the memory allocated above with size (count + 2 * sizeof(dev)).
A kmemleak reports:
unreferenced object 0x88800dda1980 (size 16):
comm "kworker/u10:5", pid 69, jiffies 4294671781
hex dump (first 16 bytes):
00 00 00
5 matches
Mail list logo
