On 11/12/2015 05:00 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 11/12/2015 08:58 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:54:48AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
300 lines of boilerplate for just setting up a few request_queues seem
wrong, can you show the actual patch you measured?
I just took it from
On 11/12/2015 08:52 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:49:08AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
But it still avoids duplicating the generics of it. Patch for null_blk:
3 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 7 deletions (-)
vs a standalone of:
3 files changed, 459 insertions(+)
It d
On 11/12/2015 08:58 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:54:48AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
300 lines of boilerplate for just setting up a few request_queues seem
wrong, can you show the actual patch you measured?
I just took it from Matias' last posting:
http://marc.info/?l=
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:54:48AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >300 lines of boilerplate for just setting up a few request_queues seem
> >wrong, can you show the actual patch you measured?
>
> I just took it from Matias' last posting:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=144605858228534&w=2
Wel
On 11/12/2015 01:53 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:06:38AM +0100, Matias Bj??rling wrote:
Add support for registering as a LightNVM device. This allows us to
evaluate the performance of the LightNVM library.
In /drivers/Makefile, LightNVM is moved above block device dri
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:49:08AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> But it still avoids duplicating the generics of it. Patch for null_blk:
>
> 3 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 7 deletions (-)
>
> vs a standalone of:
>
> 3 files changed, 459 insertions(+)
>
> It doesn't screw up null_blk, so I'd p
On 11/11/2015 11:11 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 11/11/2015 02:27 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 11/11/2015 03:06 AM, Matias Bjørling wrote:
Add support for registering as a LightNVM device. This allows us to
evaluate the performance of the LightNVM library.
In /drivers/Makefile, LightNVM is moved above
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:06:38AM +0100, Matias Bj??rling wrote:
> Add support for registering as a LightNVM device. This allows us to
> evaluate the performance of the LightNVM library.
>
> In /drivers/Makefile, LightNVM is moved above block device drivers
> to make sure that the LightNVM media
On 11/11/2015 02:27 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 11/11/2015 03:06 AM, Matias Bjørling wrote:
Add support for registering as a LightNVM device. This allows us to
evaluate the performance of the LightNVM library.
In /drivers/Makefile, LightNVM is moved above block device drivers
to make sure that the
On 11/11/2015 03:06 AM, Matias Bjørling wrote:
Add support for registering as a LightNVM device. This allows us to
evaluate the performance of the LightNVM library.
In /drivers/Makefile, LightNVM is moved above block device drivers
to make sure that the LightNVM media managers have been initiali
Add support for registering as a LightNVM device. This allows us to
evaluate the performance of the LightNVM library.
In /drivers/Makefile, LightNVM is moved above block device drivers
to make sure that the LightNVM media managers have been initialized
before drivers under /drivers/block are initi
11 matches
Mail list logo