From: ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:22:56 -0800
> David Miller writes:
>
>> From: Eric Dumazet
>> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:42:42 -0800
>>
>>> From: Eric Dumazet
>>>
>>> sock_alloc_send_pskb() & sk_page_frag_refill()
>>> have a loop trying high order allo
David Miller writes:
> From: Eric Dumazet
> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:42:42 -0800
>
>> From: Eric Dumazet
>>
>> sock_alloc_send_pskb() & sk_page_frag_refill()
>> have a loop trying high order allocations to prepare
>> skb with low number of fragments as this increases performance.
>>
>> Probl
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:42:42 -0800
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> sock_alloc_send_pskb() & sk_page_frag_refill()
> have a loop trying high order allocations to prepare
> skb with low number of fragments as this increases performance.
>
> Problem is that under memory pressure/fr
Eric Dumazet writes:
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> sock_alloc_send_pskb() & sk_page_frag_refill()
> have a loop trying high order allocations to prepare
> skb with low number of fragments as this increases performance.
>
> Problem is that under memory pressure/fragmentation, this can
> trigger OOM wh
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 18:03 -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Eric Dumazet writes:
>
> > From: Eric Dumazet
> >
> > sock_alloc_send_pskb() & sk_page_frag_refill()
> > have a loop trying high order allocations to prepare
> > skb with low number of fragments as this increases performance.
> >
> >
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Joe Perches wrote:
> > If they absolutely require local memory to
> > currnet's cpu node then that would make sense,
>
> I presumed THISNODE would be used only with NORETRY
>
Unfortunately, that would avoid attempting to defragment or reclaim
remotely for the order-3 alloc
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 13:03 -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 10:42 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > sock_alloc_send_pskb() & sk_page_frag_refill()
> > > have a loop trying high order allocations to prepare
> > > skb with low number o
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 10:42 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > sock_alloc_send_pskb() & sk_page_frag_refill()
> > have a loop trying high order allocations to prepare
> > skb with low number of fragments as this increases performance.
> >
> > Problem is that u
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 12:24 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> Perhaps add __GFP_THISNODE too ?
Why ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Ple
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 10:42 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> sock_alloc_send_pskb() & sk_page_frag_refill()
> have a loop trying high order allocations to prepare
> skb with low number of fragments as this increases performance.
>
> Problem is that under memory pressure/fragmentation, this can
> trigg
From: Eric Dumazet
sock_alloc_send_pskb() & sk_page_frag_refill()
have a loop trying high order allocations to prepare
skb with low number of fragments as this increases performance.
Problem is that under memory pressure/fragmentation, this can
trigger OOM while the intent was only to try the hi
11 matches
Mail list logo