Brian Braunstein wrote:
>
> From: Brian Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Fixed tun/tap driver's handling of hw addresses.
Okay, the attached patch applies. Can someone comment on whether
it makes sense? (pasted inline for comments)
From: Brian Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fixed tun/tap dri
Brian Braunstein wrote:
>
> From: Brian Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Fixed tun/tap driver's handling of hw addresses. The hw address is
> stored in
> both the net_device.dev_addr and tun.dev_addr fields. These fields were
> not
> kept synchronized, and in fact weren't even initialized to t
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 10:55:11PM +0200, ahmed wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 01:29:29AM -0700, Brian Braunstein wrote:
> > --- linux-2.6.20.4-ORIG/drivers/net/tun.c 2007-03-23
> > 12:52:51.0 -0700
> > +++ linux-2.6.20.4/drivers/net/tun.c2007-03-25 00:44:20.0
> > -070
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 01:29:29AM -0700, Brian Braunstein wrote:
>
> From: Brian Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
No need for this line. This line is used when you _forward_ another patch
from others. Signed-off-by is enough
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
>
From: Brian Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fixed tun/tap driver's handling of hw addresses. The hw address is stored in
both the net_device.dev_addr and tun.dev_addr fields. These fields were not
kept synchronized, and in fact weren't even initialized to the same value.
Now during both init and
5 matches
Mail list logo
