Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand/raw: MTD_NAND_BCM47XXNFLASH needs CONFIG_BCMA

2018-07-18 Thread Miquel Raynal
Hi Arnd, Boris Brezillon wrote on Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:44:46 +0200: > On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:39:44 +0200 > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > We already have a dependency on BCMA_NFLASH, which in turn depends on > > BCMA, but since BCMA is a tristate option and BCMA_NFLASH is bool, > > we can run into

Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand/raw: MTD_NAND_BCM47XXNFLASH needs CONFIG_BCMA

2018-07-11 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:39:44 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > We already have a dependency on BCMA_NFLASH, which in turn depends on > BCMA, but since BCMA is a tristate option and BCMA_NFLASH is bool, > we can run into an invalid configuration with MTD_NAND_BCM47XXNFLASH=y > and BCMA=m: > > drivers/

[PATCH] mtd: nand/raw: MTD_NAND_BCM47XXNFLASH needs CONFIG_BCMA

2018-07-11 Thread Arnd Bergmann
We already have a dependency on BCMA_NFLASH, which in turn depends on BCMA, but since BCMA is a tristate option and BCMA_NFLASH is bool, we can run into an invalid configuration with MTD_NAND_BCM47XXNFLASH=y and BCMA=m: drivers/mtd/nand/raw/bcm47xxnflash/ops_bcm4706.o: In function `bcm47xxnflash_