Re: [PATCH] moving from pci to dma

2015-01-12 Thread chas williams - CONTRACTOR
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:32:46 +0100 Quentin Lambert wrote: > > On 12/01/2015 16:27, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote: > > There doesn't seem to be a patch for review? > > > I made a mistake and forgot to number the mails. I did send them though. > Would you like me to send them again, with the pr

Re: [PATCH] moving from pci to dma

2015-01-12 Thread Quentin Lambert
On 12/01/2015 16:27, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote: There doesn't seem to be a patch for review? I made a mistake and forgot to number the mails. I did send them though. Would you like me to send them again, with the proper subject format? Quentin Lambert -- To unsubscribe from this list:

Re: [PATCH] moving from pci to dma

2015-01-12 Thread chas williams - CONTRACTOR
There doesn't seem to be a patch for review? On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:02:39 +0100 Quentin Lambert wrote: > This patch replaces the references to the deprecated pci api with the > corresponding dma api. ... > Quentin Lambert (1): > atm: remove deprecated use of pci api > > drivers/atm/eni.c

[PATCH] moving from pci to dma

2015-01-12 Thread Quentin Lambert
This patch replaces the references to the deprecated pci api with the corresponding dma api. To ensure that it was possible to access the dev field of pci_dev without checking for nullity we looked for similar access in the execution flow. The most straight forward are "&id->dev" and "pci_get_drv