On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 11:36:55AM +0100, Petr Pavlu wrote:
> In the unlikely case that setting ro_after_init data to read-only fails, it
> is too late to cancel loading of the module. The loader then issues only
> a warning about the situation. Given that this reduces the kernel's
> protection, it
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 05:48:00PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 12/03/2025 à 17:30, Kees Cook a écrit :
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 04:45:24PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > > On 3/6/25 17:57, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > > + linux-mm since we're adding TAINT_BAD_PAGE
> > > >
> >
Le 12/03/2025 à 17:30, Kees Cook a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 04:45:24PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 3/6/25 17:57, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
+ linux-mm since we're adding TAINT_BAD_PAGE
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 11:36:55AM +0100, Petr Pavlu wrote:
In the unlikely case that setting ro
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 09:30:28AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 04:45:24PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > On 3/6/25 17:57, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > + linux-mm since we're adding TAINT_BAD_PAGE
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 11:36:55AM +0100, Petr Pavlu wrote:
> >
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 04:45:24PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 3/6/25 17:57, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > + linux-mm since we're adding TAINT_BAD_PAGE
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 11:36:55AM +0100, Petr Pavlu wrote:
> >> In the unlikely case that setting ro_after_init data to read-only fa
On 3/6/25 17:57, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> + linux-mm since we're adding TAINT_BAD_PAGE
>
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 11:36:55AM +0100, Petr Pavlu wrote:
>> In the unlikely case that setting ro_after_init data to read-only fails, it
>> is too late to cancel loading of the module. The loader then iss
+ linux-mm since we're adding TAINT_BAD_PAGE
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 11:36:55AM +0100, Petr Pavlu wrote:
> In the unlikely case that setting ro_after_init data to read-only fails, it
> is too late to cancel loading of the module. The loader then issues only
> a warning about the situation. Given t
+To: Christophe Leroy
On 3/6/25 11:36, Petr Pavlu wrote:
> In the unlikely case that setting ro_after_init data to read-only fails, it
> is too late to cancel loading of the module. The loader then issues only
> a warning about the situation. Given that this reduces the kernel's
> protection, it
In the unlikely case that setting ro_after_init data to read-only fails, it
is too late to cancel loading of the module. The loader then issues only
a warning about the situation. Given that this reduces the kernel's
protection, it was suggested to make the failure more visible by tainting
the kern
9 matches
Mail list logo