On 13-08-08 02:10 PM, Christian Daudt wrote:
On 13-08-08 02:06 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, Christian Daudt wrote:
Given that mmc_gpio_get_cd can be called in softirq
context (by sdhci_tasklet_card -> sdhci_card_event ->
sdhci_do_get_cd -> mmc_gpio_get_cd ), it is neces
On 13-08-08 02:06 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, Christian Daudt wrote:
Given that mmc_gpio_get_cd can be called in softirq
context (by sdhci_tasklet_card -> sdhci_card_event ->
sdhci_do_get_cd -> mmc_gpio_get_cd ), it is necessary
for it to use gpio_get_value instead of
g
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, Christian Daudt wrote:
> Given that mmc_gpio_get_cd can be called in softirq
> context (by sdhci_tasklet_card -> sdhci_card_event ->
> sdhci_do_get_cd -> mmc_gpio_get_cd ), it is necessary
> for it to use gpio_get_value instead of
> gpio_get_value_cansleep
> Note that at presen
Given that mmc_gpio_get_cd can be called in softirq
context (by sdhci_tasklet_card -> sdhci_card_event ->
sdhci_do_get_cd -> mmc_gpio_get_cd ), it is necessary
for it to use gpio_get_value instead of
gpio_get_value_cansleep
Note that at present sdhci_card_event gets called both
from mmc_gpio_cd_irq
4 matches
Mail list logo