On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 9:09 AM Souptick Joarder wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 1:38 AM Miguel Ojeda
> wrote:
> >
> > If the user asks us for offset == num, we should already fail in the
> > first check, i.e. the one testing for offsets beyond the object.
> >
> > At the moment, we are failing
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 1:38 AM Miguel Ojeda
wrote:
>
> If the user asks us for offset == num, we should already fail in the
> first check, i.e. the one testing for offsets beyond the object.
>
> At the moment, we are failing on the second test anyway,
> since count cannot be 0. Still, to agree wi
If the user asks us for offset == num, we should already fail in the
first check, i.e. the one testing for offsets beyond the object.
At the moment, we are failing on the second test anyway,
since count cannot be 0. Still, to agree with the comment of the first
test, we should first there.
Signed
3 matches
Mail list logo