Re: [PATCH] mm/zswap: reverse zswap_entry tree/refcount relationship

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Weijie Yang wrote: > Hello Dan, > > On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Dan Streetman wrote: >> Currently, zswap_entry_put removes the entry from its tree if >> the resulting refcount is 0. Several places in code put an >> entry's initial reference, but they also mu

Re: [PATCH] mm/zswap: reverse zswap_entry tree/refcount relationship

Hello Dan, On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Dan Streetman wrote: > Currently, zswap_entry_put removes the entry from its tree if > the resulting refcount is 0. Several places in code put an > entry's initial reference, but they also must remove the entry > from its tree first, which makes the tr

[PATCH] mm/zswap: reverse zswap_entry tree/refcount relationship

Currently, zswap_entry_put removes the entry from its tree if the resulting refcount is 0. Several places in code put an entry's initial reference, but they also must remove the entry from its tree first, which makes the tree removal in zswap_entry_put redundant. I believe this has the refcount m