On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Also, size_t seems to be the correct type here, while the untyped
> definition is just an int.
>
Ok, sounds good, thanks.
Acked-by: David Rientjes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
On Wednesday 11 July 2012, David Rientjes wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to avoid this problem more generally by casting the
> __alignof__ for ARCH_{KMALLOC,SLAB}_MINALIGN to int in slab.h? All
> architectures that define these themselves will be using plain integers,
> the problem is __alignof
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/slob.c b/mm/slob.c
> index 95d1c7d..51d6a27 100644
> --- a/mm/slob.c
> +++ b/mm/slob.c
> @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ out:
> void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int node)
> {
> unsigned int *m;
> - int align = max(ARCH_KMALLOC
The types for ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN and ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN are not always
the same, as seen by building ARM collie_defconfig:
mm/slob.c: In function 'kfree':
mm/slob.c:482:153: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
mm/slob.c: In function 'ksize':
mm/slob.c:501:153: warning: co
4 matches
Mail list logo
