2017-11-20 20:39 GMT+08:00 Michal Hocko :
> On Mon 20-11-17 20:16:15, Yafang Shao wrote:
>> 2017-11-20 20:04 GMT+08:00 Michal Hocko :
>> > On Fri 17-11-17 09:49:54, Shakeel Butt wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Yafang Shao wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >> > Of couse that is the best way.
>> >>
On Mon 20-11-17 20:16:15, Yafang Shao wrote:
> 2017-11-20 20:04 GMT+08:00 Michal Hocko :
> > On Fri 17-11-17 09:49:54, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Yafang Shao wrote:
> > [...]
> >> > Of couse that is the best way.
> >> > But we can not ensue all applications will do i
2017-11-20 20:04 GMT+08:00 Michal Hocko :
> On Fri 17-11-17 09:49:54, Shakeel Butt wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Yafang Shao wrote:
> [...]
>> > Of couse that is the best way.
>> > But we can not ensue all applications will do it.
>> > That's why I introduce a proper defalut value for
On Fri 17-11-17 09:49:54, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Yafang Shao wrote:
[...]
> > Of couse that is the best way.
> > But we can not ensue all applications will do it.
> > That's why I introduce a proper defalut value for them.
> >
>
> I think we disagree on the how to
2017-11-18 1:49 GMT+08:00 Shakeel Butt :
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Yafang Shao wrote:
>> 2017-11-18 1:35 GMT+08:00 Shakeel Butt :
>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Yafang Shao wrote:
2017-11-18 0:45 GMT+08:00 Roman Gushchin :
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:20:40AM +0800, Yafang
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Yafang Shao wrote:
> 2017-11-18 1:35 GMT+08:00 Shakeel Butt :
>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Yafang Shao wrote:
>>> 2017-11-18 0:45 GMT+08:00 Roman Gushchin :
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:20:40AM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
> 2017-11-17 23:55 GMT+08:00 R
2017-11-18 1:35 GMT+08:00 Shakeel Butt :
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Yafang Shao wrote:
>> 2017-11-18 0:45 GMT+08:00 Roman Gushchin :
>>> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:20:40AM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
2017-11-17 23:55 GMT+08:00 Roman Gushchin :
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 08:43:17PM -
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Yafang Shao wrote:
> 2017-11-18 0:45 GMT+08:00 Roman Gushchin :
>> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:20:40AM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
>>> 2017-11-17 23:55 GMT+08:00 Roman Gushchin :
>>> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 08:43:17PM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
>>> >> On Thu, Nov 16
2017-11-18 0:45 GMT+08:00 Roman Gushchin :
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:20:40AM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
>> 2017-11-17 23:55 GMT+08:00 Roman Gushchin :
>> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 08:43:17PM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
>> >> > Currently th
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:20:40AM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
> 2017-11-17 23:55 GMT+08:00 Roman Gushchin :
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 08:43:17PM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
> >> > Currently the default tmpfs size is totalram_pages / 2 if mou
2017-11-17 23:55 GMT+08:00 Roman Gushchin :
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 08:43:17PM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
>> > Currently the default tmpfs size is totalram_pages / 2 if mount tmpfs
>> > without "-o size=XXX".
>> > When we mount tmpfs in a co
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 08:43:17PM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
> > Currently the default tmpfs size is totalram_pages / 2 if mount tmpfs
> > without "-o size=XXX".
> > When we mount tmpfs in a container(i.e. docker), it is also
> > totalram_page
2017-11-17 12:43 GMT+08:00 Shakeel Butt :
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
>> Currently the default tmpfs size is totalram_pages / 2 if mount tmpfs
>> without "-o size=XXX".
>> When we mount tmpfs in a container(i.e. docker), it is also
>> totalram_pages / 2 regardless of the
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Yafang Shao wrote:
> Currently the default tmpfs size is totalram_pages / 2 if mount tmpfs
> without "-o size=XXX".
> When we mount tmpfs in a container(i.e. docker), it is also
> totalram_pages / 2 regardless of the memory limit on this container.
> That may easil
Currently the default tmpfs size is totalram_pages / 2 if mount tmpfs
without "-o size=XXX".
When we mount tmpfs in a container(i.e. docker), it is also
totalram_pages / 2 regardless of the memory limit on this container.
That may easily cause OOM if tmpfs occupied too much memory when swap is
off.
15 matches
Mail list logo