Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: Fix incorrect proc nr_hugepages value

2016-02-17 Thread Vaishali Thakkar
On Wednesday 17 February 2016 03:29 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 01:13:26AM +0530, Vaishali Thakkar wrote: >> Currently incorrect default hugepage pool size is reported by proc >> nr_hugepages when number of pages for the default huge page size is >> specified twice. >>

Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: Fix incorrect proc nr_hugepages value

2016-02-17 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 01:13:26AM +0530, Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > Currently incorrect default hugepage pool size is reported by proc > nr_hugepages when number of pages for the default huge page size is > specified twice. > > When multiple huge page sizes are supported, /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages

Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: Fix incorrect proc nr_hugepages value

2016-02-16 Thread Naoya Horiguchi
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 01:13:26AM +0530, Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > Currently incorrect default hugepage pool size is reported by proc > nr_hugepages when number of pages for the default huge page size is > specified twice. > > When multiple huge page sizes are supported, /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages

[PATCH] mm/hugetlb: Fix incorrect proc nr_hugepages value

2016-02-16 Thread Vaishali Thakkar
Currently incorrect default hugepage pool size is reported by proc nr_hugepages when number of pages for the default huge page size is specified twice. When multiple huge page sizes are supported, /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages indicates the current number of pre-allocated huge pages of the default siz