Hi Lee,
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 08:37:49AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2016, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 01:45:12PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > From: Shawn Nematbakhsh
> > >
> > > pkt_xfer should be used for protocol v3, and cmd_xfer otherwise. We had
> > >
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016, Brian Norris wrote:
> + Benson
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 01:45:12PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> > From: Shawn Nematbakhsh
> >
> > pkt_xfer should be used for protocol v3, and cmd_xfer otherwise. We had
> > one instance of these functions correct, but not the second, fall
Hey Brian,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> I believe this was supposed to go through Olof. Olof, are you out there?
>
> Or Benson? I see this:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1273587.html
> [PATCH] platform/chrome : Add myself as Maintainer
>
+ Benson
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 01:45:12PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> From: Shawn Nematbakhsh
>
> pkt_xfer should be used for protocol v3, and cmd_xfer otherwise. We had
> one instance of these functions correct, but not the second, fall-back
> case. We use the fall-back only when the first c
On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Brian Norris wrote:
> From: Shawn Nematbakhsh
>
> pkt_xfer should be used for protocol v3, and cmd_xfer otherwise. We had
> one instance of these functions correct, but not the second, fall-back
> case. We use the fall-back only when the first command returns an
> IN_PROGRES
From: Shawn Nematbakhsh
pkt_xfer should be used for protocol v3, and cmd_xfer otherwise. We had
one instance of these functions correct, but not the second, fall-back
case. We use the fall-back only when the first command returns an
IN_PROGRESS status, which is only used on some EC firmwares wher
6 matches
Mail list logo