Re: [PATCH] make loglevels in init/main.c a little more sane.

On 8/22/05, Coywolf Qi Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 01:17:59PM +0800, Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote: > > On 1/23/05, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [snip] > > > + printk(KERN_NOTICE); > > > printk(linux_banner); > > > > Why not merge it to the same l

Re: [PATCH] make loglevels in init/main.c a little more sane.

On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 01:17:59PM +0800, Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote: > On 1/23/05, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > This patch modifies a few of the printk() loglevels used in init/main.c in > > an attempt to make them a bit more appropriate. > > > > The default loglevel is KERN_WARNING

Re: [PATCH] make loglevels in init/main.c a little more sane.

On 1/23/05, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This patch modifies a few of the printk() loglevels used in init/main.c in > an attempt to make them a bit more appropriate. > > The default loglevel is KERN_WARNING, but a few printk's without explicit > loglevel are not (in my oppinion) war

[PATCH] make loglevels in init/main.c a little more sane.

This patch modifies a few of the printk() loglevels used in init/main.c in an attempt to make them a bit more appropriate. The default loglevel is KERN_WARNING, but a few printk's without explicit loglevel are not (in my oppinion) warnings, so add proper warning levels - for instance; telling