On 02. 08. 19 6:59, Nishka Dasgupta wrote:
> On 31/07/19 7:51 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 31. 07. 19 15:06, Nishka Dasgupta wrote:
>>> On 31/07/19 2:01 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
On 09. 07. 19 19:28, Nishka Dasgupta wrote:
> Each iteration of for_each_available_child_of_node puts the previo
On 31/07/19 7:51 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
On 31. 07. 19 15:06, Nishka Dasgupta wrote:
On 31/07/19 2:01 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
On 09. 07. 19 19:28, Nishka Dasgupta wrote:
Each iteration of for_each_available_child_of_node puts the previous
node, but in the case of a goto from the middle of the
On 31. 07. 19 15:06, Nishka Dasgupta wrote:
> On 31/07/19 2:01 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 09. 07. 19 19:28, Nishka Dasgupta wrote:
>>> Each iteration of for_each_available_child_of_node puts the previous
>>> node, but in the case of a goto from the middle of the loop, there is
>>> no put, thus c
On 31/07/19 2:01 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
On 09. 07. 19 19:28, Nishka Dasgupta wrote:
Each iteration of for_each_available_child_of_node puts the previous
node, but in the case of a goto from the middle of the loop, there is
no put, thus causing a memory leak. Hence add an of_node_put before the
On 09. 07. 19 19:28, Nishka Dasgupta wrote:
> Each iteration of for_each_available_child_of_node puts the previous
> node, but in the case of a goto from the middle of the loop, there is
> no put, thus causing a memory leak. Hence add an of_node_put before the
> goto.
> Issue found with Coccinelle.
Each iteration of for_each_available_child_of_node puts the previous
node, but in the case of a goto from the middle of the loop, there is
no put, thus causing a memory leak. Hence add an of_node_put before the
goto.
Issue found with Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Nishka Dasgupta
---
drivers/mailbox
6 matches
Mail list logo
