Re: [PATCH] list-style makefile boilerplate without reordering

2000-11-02 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 09:03:23AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > > + > > +# include a local makefile, if present > > +-include Makefile.local > > Why? someone on lkml suggested it. It will not hurt but help some people. > > [all the other changes]

Re: [PATCH] list-style makefile boilerplate without reordering

2000-11-01 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > + > +# include a local makefile, if present > +-include Makefile.local Why? > +%.i: %.c > + $(CPP) $(CFLAGS) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS_$@) $< > $@ Why? Well, I know, it's historical, but does anyone think we actually need this? > +%.s: %.S > +

[PATCH] list-style makefile boilerplate without reordering

2000-11-01 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Hi Linus, this patch creates a Makefile.inc that implements the new-style make rules in a simmilar manner to your recent change to drivers/usb/Makefile but preserves compatiblity to all list-style Makefile. A compat Rules.make that supports old Makefiles but uses Makefile.inc is also included. M