Re: [PATCH] linux/types.h: always export 64bit aligned defines

2008-01-29 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Jan 29 2008 19:16, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> >> Some kernel headers exported to userspace rely on these 64bit >> >> aligned defines. However, they are hidden behind >> >> __KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES at the moment which means most of the time, >> >> they're never actually available. >> >> Wrong way. >

Re: [PATCH] linux/types.h: always export 64bit aligned defines

2008-01-29 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Jan 27 2008 21:33, Andrew Morton wrote: > >On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 04:23:21 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Some kernel headers exported to userspace rely on these 64bit > >> aligned defines. However, they are hidden behind >

Re: [PATCH] linux/types.h: always export 64bit aligned defines

2008-01-29 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Jan 27 2008 21:33, Andrew Morton wrote: >On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 04:23:21 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Some kernel headers exported to userspace rely on these 64bit >> aligned defines. However, they are hidden behind >> __KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES at the moment which means most of

Re: [PATCH] linux/types.h: always export 64bit aligned defines

2008-01-27 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 04:23:21 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some kernel headers exported to userspace rely on these 64bit aligned defines. > However, they are hidden behind __KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES at the moment which > means most of the time, they're never actually available. The

[PATCH] linux/types.h: always export 64bit aligned defines

2008-01-26 Thread Mike Frysinger
Some kernel headers exported to userspace rely on these 64bit aligned defines. However, they are hidden behind __KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES at the moment which means most of the time, they're never actually available. These these defines dont actually conflict with normal userspace / C library types, the