Alan wrote:
This I believe completes the PIIX range of support for libata
This adds the table entries needed for the PIIX3, both a new PCI
identifier and a new mode list. It also fixes an erroneous access to PCI
configuration 0x48 on non UDMA capable chips.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTE
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:13:38 +, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This I believe completes the PIIX range of support for libata
This adds the table entries needed for the PIIX3, both a new PCI
identifier and a new mode list. It also fixes an erroneous access to PCI
co
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:08:12 +0100 (MET)
Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:13:38 +, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >This I believe completes the PIIX range of support for libata
> >
> >This adds the table entries needed for the PIIX3, both a new PCI
> >id
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:13:38 +, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This I believe completes the PIIX range of support for libata
>
>This adds the table entries needed for the PIIX3, both a new PCI
>identifier and a new mode list. It also fixes an erroneous access to PCI
>configuration 0x48 on non
Alan wrote:
@@ -786,7 +797,8 @@
{ 2, 3 }, };
pci_read_config_word(dev, master_port, &master_data);
- pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0x48, &udma_enable);
+ if (ap->udma_mask)
+ pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0x48, &udma_enable);
if (speed >= XFE
This I believe completes the PIIX range of support for libata
This adds the table entries needed for the PIIX3, both a new PCI
identifier and a new mode list. It also fixes an erroneous access to PCI
configuration 0x48 on non UDMA capable chips.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- li
6 matches
Mail list logo