On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:24 AM Petr Mladek wrote:
> By other words, every print_hex_dump() used need to be reviewed in
> which context might be called.
I did a rough analysis of all current usage of DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS in
the kernel, compared to the introduction of %px and hashed addresses,
usi
On Thu 2021-01-14 20:56:36, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 1/11/21 7:30 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I doubt if Kees (or I or anyone else) can review this change because
> > there are no callers which actually use the new DUMP_PREFIX_UNHASHED.
> > Is it intended that some other places in the kernel be chan
On 1/11/21 7:30 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
I doubt if Kees (or I or anyone else) can review this change because
there are no callers which actually use the new DUMP_PREFIX_UNHASHED.
Is it intended that some other places in the kernel be changed to use
this? If so, please describe where and why, so
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:10:56 +0100 Petr Mladek wrote:
> Adding Kees into CC because it is security related.
> Adding Andrew into CC because he usually takes patches for hexdump.
>
> On Wed 2021-01-06 15:35:47, Timur Tabi wrote:
> > Hashed addresses are useless in hexdumps unless you're comparing
Adding Kees into CC because it is security related.
Adding Andrew into CC because he usually takes patches for hexdump.
On Wed 2021-01-06 15:35:47, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Hashed addresses are useless in hexdumps unless you're comparing
> with other hashed addresses, which is unlikely. However, there
Hashed addresses are useless in hexdumps unless you're comparing
with other hashed addresses, which is unlikely. However, there's
no need to break existing code, so introduce a new prefix type
that prints unhashed addresses.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi
Cc: Roman Fietze
---
include/linux/printk.h
6 matches
Mail list logo
