Re: [PATCH] ld-version: fix it on Fedora

2016-02-11 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > GNU ld version 2.25-15.fc23 > > > > But ld-version.sh fails to parse this, so e.g. mips build fails to > > enable VDSO, printing a warning that binutils >= 2.24 is required. > > > > To fix, teach ld-version to parse this format. > > > > Signed-off-by

Re: [PATCH] ld-version: fix it on Fedora

2016-01-31 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Sat, 30 Jan 2016, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > % echo 2.24.51.20140217 | ld-version.sh > > 22451000 > > So the above version is a non-release snapshot from the development tree > as the repository trunk is switched to x.y+1.51 once a release branch for > x.y has been made. Then the release

Re: [PATCH] ld-version: fix it on Fedora

2016-01-30 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > > At the moment, I'm wondering whether we really need to handle more > > > than three version number components. Another thought is that the > > > comparison could be inside ld-version.sh (or a replacement) so that > > > it can compare the array

Re: [PATCH] ld-version: fix it on Fedora

2016-01-25 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
rg; Linux MIPS Mailing List; Ralf Baechle > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ld-version: fix it on Fedora > > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Daniel Sanders > > mailto:daniel.sand...@imgtec.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The version number that's

RE: [PATCH] ld-version: fix it on Fedora

2016-01-25 Thread Daniel Sanders
> From: Alexander Kapshuk [alexander.kaps...@gmail.com] > Sent: 23 January 2016 14:41 > To: Daniel Sanders > Cc: James Hogan; Michael S. Tsirkin; LKML; Michal Marek; > linux-kbu...@vger.kernel.org; Linux MIPS Mailing List; Ralf Baechle > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ld-version: fix it