Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:51:19 -0800
>> Hiroshi Shimamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I posted 2 patches to fix kernel panic and memory leak.
>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/282
>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008
* Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:51:19 -0800
> Hiroshi Shimamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I posted 2 patches to fix kernel panic and memory leak.
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/282
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/283
> >
> > But,
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:51:19 -0800
Hiroshi Shimamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I posted 2 patches to fix kernel panic and memory leak.
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/282
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/283
>
> But, I think this patch is better than old ones.
>
> ---
> From: Hirosh
Hi,
I posted 2 patches to fix kernel panic and memory leak.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/282
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/283
But, I think this patch is better than old ones.
---
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reading /proc//latency or /proc//task//latency could cause
NULL poin
4 matches
Mail list logo