Hi Tetsuo,
please do not start the off-list discussions ;)
On 09/15, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>
> I examined do_coredump() case and found similar result.
...
> Do we want to change from call_usermodehelper_exec(UMH_WAIT_EXEC) to
> call_usermodehelper_exec(UMH_WAIT_EXEC | UMH_WAIT_KILLABLE)
To me, t
On 09/15, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > I am wondering if this can be simplified...
> >
> > At least you can move create->done from kthread_create_info to the
> > stack, and turn create->owner into the pointer to that completion.
>
> Use of DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK() looks harm
Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> I am wondering if this can be simplified...
>
> At least you can move create->done from kthread_create_info to the
> stack, and turn create->owner into the pointer to that completion.
Use of DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK() looks harmful to me because current thread
needs to be
Add lkml.
On 09/13, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>
> This patch makes kthread_create() killable,
Probably makes sense...
> @@ -255,36 +266,59 @@ struct task_struct *kthread_create_on_node(int
> (*threadfn)(void *data),
> const char namefmt[],
>
4 matches
Mail list logo