Re: [PATCH] jfs should use MAX_LFS_FILESIZE when calculating s_maxbytes

2017-08-31 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Aug 31, 2017, at 3:46 PM, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > > jfs had previously avoided the use of MAX_LFS_FILESIZE because it hadn't > accounted for the whole 32-bit index range on 32-bit systems. That has > been fixed, so we can simplify the code now. > > Suggested by Andreas Dilger. > > Signed-off-

[PATCH] jfs should use MAX_LFS_FILESIZE when calculating s_maxbytes

2017-08-31 Thread Dave Kleikamp
jfs had previously avoided the use of MAX_LFS_FILESIZE because it hadn't accounted for the whole 32-bit index range on 32-bit systems. That has been fixed, so we can simplify the code now. Suggested by Andreas Dilger. Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp Cc: Andreas Dilger Cc: jfs-discuss...@lists.sour