Hi, Marc
On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 08:54 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 18/01/18 01:53, Yang, Shunyong wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Marc
> >
> > On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 10:43 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > >
> > > On 17/01/18 10:20, Yang, Shunyong wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi, Thomas and Marc,
> > > >
On 18/01/18 01:53, Yang, Shunyong wrote:
> Hi, Marc
>
> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 10:43 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 17/01/18 10:20, Yang, Shunyong wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, Thomas and Marc,
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 11:01 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Yang, Shunyong wr
Hi, Marc
On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 10:43 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 17/01/18 10:20, Yang, Shunyong wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Thomas and Marc,
> >
> > On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 11:01 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Yang, Shunyong wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 2018
On 17/01/18 10:20, Yang, Shunyong wrote:
> Hi, Thomas and Marc,
>
> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 11:01 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Yang, Shunyong wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 10:33 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
And how is that different from:
>
>
>
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Yang, Shunyong wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 11:01 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > You can retrieve the same information from the irq/irqs files. All it
> > takes
> > is a shell script.
> >
> > Aside of that with hierarchical irq domains the old debug output is
> > just
> >
Hi, Thomas and Marc,
On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 11:01 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Yang, Shunyong wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 10:33 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >
> > > And how is that different from:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The nodes under debugfs irq/i
On 17/01/18 09:47, Yang, Shunyong wrote:
> Hi, Thomas,
>
> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 10:33 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Yang, Shunyong wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi, Marc and Thomas,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your feedback.
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 10:18 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Yang, Shunyong wrote:
> Hi, Marc and Thomas,
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 10:18 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > >
> > > In all honesty, I'd be more inclined to remove this debug feature
> > > altogeth
Hi, Marc and Thomas,
Thanks for your feedback.
On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 10:18 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >
> > In all honesty, I'd be more inclined to remove this debug feature
> > altogether, as CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_DEBUGFS is more complete and more
>
On 17/01/18 09:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> In all honesty, I'd be more inclined to remove this debug feature
>> altogether, as CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_DEBUGFS is more complete and more
>> useful. Is there any feature missing from that infrastructure that
>> p
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> In all honesty, I'd be more inclined to remove this debug feature
> altogether, as CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_DEBUGFS is more complete and more
> useful. Is there any feature missing from that infrastructure that
> prevents you from using it instead?
>
> If the a
Hi Yang,
On 17/01/18 04:37, Yang Shunyong wrote:
> With recent hashed kernel pointers change, output with %p will
> output hashed address. This patch changes %p to %px in irq domain
> debug information. As unprivileged user has no permission to mount
> debugfs or set printk level to KERN_DEBUG to
With recent hashed kernel pointers change, output with %p will
output hashed address. This patch changes %p to %px in irq domain
debug information. As unprivileged user has no permission to mount
debugfs or set printk level to KERN_DEBUG to access the information,
changes in this patch are appropri
13 matches
Mail list logo
