On 23/06/2016 19:11, Jason Cooper wrote:
Qais,
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:43:07AM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote:
Hmm I certainly did test this on real hardware with GIC. Are you using the
new dev domain? The idea is that GIC is logically divided and shouldn't be
used directly. Sorry I'm travelling a
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Jason Cooper wrote:
> Qais,
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:43:07AM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > Hmm I certainly did test this on real hardware with GIC. Are you using the
> > new dev domain? The idea is that GIC is logically divided and shouldn't be
> > used directly. Sorry
Qais,
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:43:07AM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote:
> Hmm I certainly did test this on real hardware with GIC. Are you using the
> new dev domain? The idea is that GIC is logically divided and shouldn't be
> used directly. Sorry I'm travelling and can't check the code.
Any update o
When allocating a new device IRQ, gic_dev_domain_alloc() correctly calls
irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(), but gic_irq_domain_alloc() does not. This
means that gic_irq_domain believes all IRQs from the dev domain have an
hwirq of 0 and creates incorrect mappings in the linear_revmap. As
gic_irq_doma
4 matches
Mail list logo