On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 08:08 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:54:55PM +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 21:19 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 11:18:06AM +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 20:08 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:54:55PM +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 21:19 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 11:18:06AM +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 20:08 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:37:52AM +0800, Yanmin Zhang
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 21:19 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 11:18:06AM +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 20:08 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:37:52AM +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 18:02 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 11:18:06AM +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 20:08 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:37:52AM +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 18:02 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 08:53:29AM +0800, Yanmin Zhang
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 20:08 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:37:52AM +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 18:02 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 08:53:29AM +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 15:18 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrot
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:37:52AM +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 18:02 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 08:53:29AM +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 15:18 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, shuox@intel.com wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 18:02 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 08:53:29AM +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 15:18 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, shuox@intel.com wrote:
> > > > From: Zhang Yanmin
> > > >
> > > > synchronize_irq waits pen
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 08:53:29AM +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 15:18 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, shuox@intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Zhang Yanmin
> > >
> > > synchronize_irq waits pending IRQ handlers to be finished. If using this
> > > function
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 15:18 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, shuox@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Zhang Yanmin
> >
> > synchronize_irq waits pending IRQ handlers to be finished. If using this
> > function while holding a resource, the IRQ handler may cause deadlock.
> >
> > He
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, shuox@intel.com wrote:
> From: Zhang Yanmin
>
> synchronize_irq waits pending IRQ handlers to be finished. If using this
> function while holding a resource, the IRQ handler may cause deadlock.
>
> Here we add a new function irq_in_progress which doesn't wait for the hand
From: Zhang Yanmin
synchronize_irq waits pending IRQ handlers to be finished. If using this
function while holding a resource, the IRQ handler may cause deadlock.
Here we add a new function irq_in_progress which doesn't wait for the handlers
to be finished.
A typical use case at suspend-to-ram:
11 matches
Mail list logo