On 9/29/19 6:24 AM, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Hi Waiman,
>
> I have now written the mail 3 times:
> Twice I thought that I found a race, but during further analysis, it
> always turns out that the spin_lock() is sufficient.
>
> First, to avoid any obvious things: Until the series with e.g.
> 27d7be18
Hi Waiman,
I have now written the mail 3 times:
Twice I thought that I found a race, but during further analysis, it
always turns out that the spin_lock() is sufficient.
First, to avoid any obvious things: Until the series with e.g.
27d7be1801a4824e, there was a race inside sem_lock().
Thus
Hi,
On 9/26/19 8:12 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
On 9/26/19 5:34 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 11:54:02AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
While looking at a customr bug report about potential missed wakeup in
the system V semaphore code, I spot a potential problem. The fact that
semaph
On 9/26/19 5:34 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 11:54:02AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> While looking at a customr bug report about potential missed wakeup in
>> the system V semaphore code, I spot a potential problem. The fact that
>> semaphore waiter stays in TASK_RUNNING sta
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 11:54:02AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> While looking at a customr bug report about potential missed wakeup in
> the system V semaphore code, I spot a potential problem. The fact that
> semaphore waiter stays in TASK_RUNNING state while checking queue status
> may lead to mi
While looking at a customr bug report about potential missed wakeup in
the system V semaphore code, I spot a potential problem. The fact that
semaphore waiter stays in TASK_RUNNING state while checking queue status
may lead to missed wakeup if a spurious wakeup happens in the right
moment as try_t
6 matches
Mail list logo