"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
> On 08/16/2017 07:14 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Aleksa Sarai writes:
>>
A couple of things to note on the bigger picture.
The glibc library on all distributions has been changed to not have a
setuid binary pt_chown, that uses ptsna
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:20:13AM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> On 08/16/2017 07:14 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Aleksa Sarai writes:
> >
> >>> A couple of things to note on the bigger picture.
> >>>
> >>> The glibc library on all distributions has been changed to not have a
>
On 08/16/2017 07:14 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Aleksa Sarai writes:
>
>>> A couple of things to note on the bigger picture.
>>>
>>> The glibc library on all distributions has been changed to not have a
>>> setuid binary pt_chown, that uses ptsname. This was the primary fix
>>> for the securi
Aleksa Sarai writes:
>> A couple of things to note on the bigger picture.
>>
>> The glibc library on all distributions has been changed to not have a
>> setuid binary pt_chown, that uses ptsname. This was the primary fix
>> for the security issue.
>>
>> The behavior of opening /dev/ptmx has been
A couple of things to note on the bigger picture.
The glibc library on all distributions has been changed to not have a
setuid binary pt_chown, that uses ptsname. This was the primary fix
for the security issue.
The behavior of opening /dev/ptmx has been changed to perform a path
lookup relativ
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
> On 06/09/2017 07:01 PM, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
>> The feature this patch references has currently only been accepted into
>> tty-testing, but Greg told me to kick this down to man-pages. As a
>> result, I can't reference upstream commit id's because the code i
I've applied this patch, and then tweaked the wording a little. Could
you please check the following text:
TIOCGPTPEERint flags
(since Linux 4.13) Given a file descriptor in fd that
refers to a pseudoterminal master, open (with the given
On 06/09/2017 07:01 PM, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> The feature this patch references has currently only been accepted into
> tty-testing, but Greg told me to kick this down to man-pages. As a
> result, I can't reference upstream commit id's because the code isn't in
> Linus' tree yet -- should I resend
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 03:01:47AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> The feature this patch references has currently only been accepted into
> tty-testing, but Greg told me to kick this down to man-pages. As a
> result, I can't reference upstream commit id's because the code isn't in
> Linus' tree yet -
The feature this patch references has currently only been accepted into
tty-testing, but Greg told me to kick this down to man-pages. As a
result, I can't reference upstream commit id's because the code isn't in
Linus' tree yet -- should I resend this once it lands in tty-next or
Linus' tree?
Also
10 matches
Mail list logo