Quoting Peter Rosin :
On 2017-07-07 06:35, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi Peter,
Quoting Peter Rosin :
On 2017-07-07 00:08, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Check return value from call to devm_kzalloc()
in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference.
Right, thanks for finding that one! There's
On 2017-07-07 06:35, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Quoting Peter Rosin :
>
>> On 2017-07-07 00:08, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>> Check return value from call to devm_kzalloc()
>>> in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference.
>>
>> Right, thanks for finding that one! There's anoth
Hi Peter,
Quoting Peter Rosin :
On 2017-07-07 00:08, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Check return value from call to devm_kzalloc()
in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference.
Right, thanks for finding that one! There's another one inside the
for loop that is just starting in the context of t
On 2017-07-07 00:08, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Check return value from call to devm_kzalloc()
> in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference.
Right, thanks for finding that one! There's another one inside the
for loop that is just starting in the context of this patch. Care
to fix checking th
Check return value from call to devm_kzalloc()
in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference.
This issue was detected using Coccinelle and the following semantic patch:
@@
expression x;
identifier fld;
@@
* x = devm_kzalloc(...);
... when != x == NULL
x->fld
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. S
5 matches
Mail list logo
