Naveen
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Naveen Krishna Ch
wrote:
>> I would like to know any comments on
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2513361/
>>
>> Its been pending for a while now.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Naveen
> Ping
> Any comments please
I assume you're asking for a ping for the _othe
On 23 May 2013 10:55, Naveen Krishna Ch wrote:
> On 23 May 2013 02:46, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 05/20/2013 06:09 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>> Naveen,
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
>>> wrote:
The exynos_adc device structure was wrongly extracted from
On 23 May 2013 02:46, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 05/20/2013 06:09 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Naveen,
>>
>> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
>> wrote:
>>> The exynos_adc device structure was wrongly extracted from the dev*
>>> correcting the same.
>>>
>>> Using the reg
On 05/20/2013 06:09 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Naveen,
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
> wrote:
>> The exynos_adc device structure was wrongly extracted from the dev*
>> correcting the same.
>>
>> Using the regular conversion of
>> struct device* -> struct platform_
Naveen,
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
wrote:
> The exynos_adc device structure was wrongly extracted from the dev*
> correcting the same.
>
> Using the regular conversion of
> struct device* -> struct platform_device* -> struct exynos_adc* seems wrong.
> Instead we sh
The exynos_adc device structure was wrongly extracted from the dev*
correcting the same.
Using the regular conversion of
struct device* -> struct platform_device* -> struct exynos_adc* seems wrong.
Instead we should be doing
struct device* -> struct iio_dev* -> struct exynos_adc*
Signed-off-by: N
6 matches
Mail list logo
