On Tuesday 18 November 2014 06:56:11 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/17/2014 12:35 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 October 2014 18:45:07 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:37:34PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 22 October 2014 19:10:05 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>
On 11/17/2014 12:35 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Thursday 23 October 2014 18:45:07 Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:37:34PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 22 October 2014 19:10:05 Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 06:35:53PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 2
On Thursday 23 October 2014 18:45:07 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:37:34PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 October 2014 19:10:05 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 06:35:53PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 22 October 2014 18:19:47 Guen
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:37:34PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 October 2014 19:10:05 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 06:35:53PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 22 October 2014 18:19:47 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:29:06PM +0200,
On Wednesday 22 October 2014 19:10:05 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 06:35:53PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 October 2014 18:19:47 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:29:06PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 21 October 2014 06:27:23 Guent
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 06:35:53PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 October 2014 18:19:47 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:29:06PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 21 October 2014 06:27:23 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > On 10/20/2014 09:46 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
On Wednesday 22 October 2014 18:19:47 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:29:06PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 October 2014 06:27:23 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 10/20/2014 09:46 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > Ok, I will describe my problem. Guenter, maybe you can
> > >
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:29:06PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 October 2014 06:27:23 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 10/20/2014 09:46 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > Ok, I will describe my problem. Guenter, maybe you can find
> > > another solution/fix for it.
> > >
> > > Calling i8k_get_temp
On Tuesday 21 October 2014 06:27:23 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/20/2014 09:46 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Ok, I will describe my problem. Guenter, maybe you can find
> > another solution/fix for it.
> >
> > Calling i8k_get_temp(3) on my laptop without
> > I8K_TEMPERATURE_BUG always returns value 19
On 10/20/2014 09:46 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
Ok, I will describe my problem. Guenter, maybe you can find
another solution/fix for it.
Calling i8k_get_temp(3) on my laptop without I8K_TEMPERATURE_BUG
always returns value 193 (which is above I8K_MAX_TEMP).
When I8K_TEMPERATURE_BUG is enabled (by def
Ok, I will describe my problem. Guenter, maybe you can find
another solution/fix for it.
Calling i8k_get_temp(3) on my laptop without I8K_TEMPERATURE_BUG
always returns value 193 (which is above I8K_MAX_TEMP).
When I8K_TEMPERATURE_BUG is enabled (by default) then
i8k_get_temp(3) returns value
On 10/19/2014 07:46 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
On some machines some temperature sensors report too high values which are
What is "too high", and what is "some machines" ?
Would be great if you can be more specific.
invalid. When value is invalid function i8k_get_temp() returns previous
value and
On some machines some temperature sensors report too high values which are
invalid. When value is invalid function i8k_get_temp() returns previous
value and at next call it returns I8K_MAX_TEMP.
With this patch also firt i8k_get_temp() call returns I8K_MAX_TEMP and
i8k_init_hwmon() will ignore all
13 matches
Mail list logo
