On 03/10/2014 08:26 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
I won't be doing those changes though. My sponsor's budget is
limited, so I'm just having to do the minimum I can get away with.
Pity. Are you available for testing in case someone comes up with a
patch?
Not really, the customer is using a 2.6.3
> I won't be doing those changes though. My sponsor's budget is
> limited, so I'm just having to do the minimum I can get away with.
Pity. Are you available for testing in case someone comes up with a
patch?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 03/09/2014 09:28 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:32:05AM +0100, mike.looijm...@topic.nl wrote:
From: Mike Looijmans
Having a board where the I2C bus locks up occasionally made it clear
that the bus recovery in the i2c-davinci driver will only work on
some boards, because
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:32:05AM +0100, mike.looijm...@topic.nl wrote:
> From: Mike Looijmans
>
> Having a board where the I2C bus locks up occasionally made it clear
> that the bus recovery in the i2c-davinci driver will only work on
> some boards, because on regular boards, this will only tog
From: Mike Looijmans
Having a board where the I2C bus locks up occasionally made it clear
that the bus recovery in the i2c-davinci driver will only work on
some boards, because on regular boards, this will only toggle GPIO
lines that aren't muxed to the actual pins.
The I2C controller has the bu
5 matches
Mail list logo