On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:15:53PM +0100, zyphr wrote:
> Something looks odd.
> I've tested this with 2.6.11-rc3-bk5 + your lasted patch
>
> cat /sys/module/usbhid/parameters/mousepoll says it's at 2ms
> but if I check /proc/bus/usb/devices it's reading 10ms
>
> I've used parameter under /etc/mod
Am Dienstag, 8. Februar 2005 16:15 schrieb zyphr:
> Something looks odd.
> I've tested this with 2.6.11-rc3-bk5 + your lasted patch
>
> cat /sys/module/usbhid/parameters/mousepoll says it's at 2ms
> but if I check /proc/bus/usb/devices it's reading 10ms
You're reading the device descriptor. It is
Something looks odd.
I've tested this with 2.6.11-rc3-bk5 + your lasted patch
cat /sys/module/usbhid/parameters/mousepoll says it's at 2ms
but if I check /proc/bus/usb/devices it's reading 10ms
I've used parameter under /etc/modules (debian sarge)
in there I have added: usbhid mousepoll=2
this u
This includes the kernel-parameters.txt-patch, and the hid-core.c-patch,
without the extra else-statement.
Thanks,
Mikkel
Signed-off-by: Mikkel Krautz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
--- clean/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ dirty/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
SWS
Alright, I'll send it in a bit!
Thanks,
Mikkel
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:38:18 +0100, Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 06:56:50PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote:
> > Sorry, I now realise that my way of doing this only sets
> > hid_mousepoll_interval to the latest-plugg
Sorry, I now realise that my way of doing this only sets
hid_mousepoll_interval to the latest-plugged-in mouse's polling
interval.
How should I handle this? Just remove the line, and keep the "0 feature"?
Thanks,
Mikkel
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 18:51:46 +0100, Mikkel Krautz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are you talking about the following line?
+ else
+ hid_mousepoll_interval = interval;
If so, I put it there, to fill a tiny gap, i felt was missing.
If no parameter is passed, hid_mousepoll_interval is obviously 0.
If a user, who doesn't pass the parameter to
Domen Puncer wrote:
On 07/02/05 07:59 -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
+static unsigned int hid_mousepoll_interval;
+module_param_named(mousepoll, hid_mousepoll_interval, uint, 0644);
Why is it writable by root? IOW, will writing a new value to it
change the operational value dynamically?
Also, from the
On 07/02/05 07:59 -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> Mikkel Krautz wrote:
> >And, here's an updated version of hid-core.c:
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Mikkel Krautz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >---
> >--- clean/drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c
> >+++ dirty/drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c
...
> >+
> >+static unsigned int hi
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> Why is it writable by root? IOW, will writing a new value to it
> change the operational value dynamically?
Yes, sort of. It requires a re-plug of the mouse, though. :)
> Also, from the kernel-parameters.txt patch:
> (a) "which"
> (b) drop one of the "at"s... either one.
O
Mikkel Krautz wrote:
And, here's an updated version of hid-core.c:
Signed-off-by: Mikkel Krautz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
--- clean/drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c
+++ dirty/drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c
@@ -37,13 +37,20 @@
* Version Information
*/
-#define DRIVER_VERSION "v2.0"
+#define DRIVER_VER
And, here's an updated version of hid-core.c:
Signed-off-by: Mikkel Krautz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
--- clean/drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c
+++ dirty/drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c
@@ -37,13 +37,20 @@
* Version Information
*/
-#define DRIVER_VERSION "v2.0"
+#define DRIVER_VERSION "v2.01"
#defin
Here's an updated version of kernel-parameters.txt:
Signed-off-by: Mikkel Krautz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
--- clean/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ dirty/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
SWSUSP Software suspension is enabled.
TS Appropriate touchsc
Thanks for the suggestions. :)
I'm wondering if there perhaps is a more clean way to do this? Perhaps
something that would give the user the possibility to change the
polling interface per device, or something like that, perhaps exported
to sysfs? Though, since you mentioned that the endpoint desc
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 01:52:06AM +, Mikkel Krautz wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 08:53:31 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 05:39:25PM +, Mikkel Krautz wrote:
> > > On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 18:59:48 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > What about
15 matches
Mail list logo
