m>
>
> So it should show up in the same thread as this email?
>
> [RFC 2/2] drm/bridge: Add I2C based driver for ps8640 bridge
Sorry it's not that email, but here is the mutt thread view in my mbox:
Oct 06 William Breathi (7.8K:0) [PATCH v4] gpio: Add GPIO suppor
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 04:47:23PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:14 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c:151:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The
> > core will do it.
> >
> > Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:14 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c:151:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core
> will do it.
>
> Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
>
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
>
> CC
drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65218.c:153:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will
do it.
Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
CC: Nicolas Saenz Julienne
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu
---
gpio-tps65218.
drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c:151:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core
will do it.
Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
CC: William Breathitt Gray
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu
---
gpio-104-id
5 matches
Mail list logo