On 7/4/19 9:19 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2019, Shijith Thotton wrote:
>> On 7/4/19 12:13 AM, Julien Thierry wrote:
>>> Looking at handle_percpu_irq(), I think this might be acceptable. But
>>> does it make sense to only have kstats for percpu NMIs?
>>>
>>
>> It would be better to
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019, Shijith Thotton wrote:
> On 7/4/19 12:13 AM, Julien Thierry wrote:
> > Looking at handle_percpu_irq(), I think this might be acceptable. But
> > does it make sense to only have kstats for percpu NMIs?
> >
>
> It would be better to have stats for both.
>
> handle_fasteoi_nmi()
Hi Julien,
On 7/4/19 12:13 AM, Julien Thierry wrote:
> On 04/07/2019 05:22, Shijith Thotton wrote:
>> The NMI handlers handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_nmi() and
>> handle_fasteoi_nmi() added by commit 2dcf1fbcad35 ("genirq: Provide NMI
>> handlers") do not update the interrupt counts. Due to that the
Hi Shijith,
On 04/07/2019 05:22, Shijith Thotton wrote:
> The NMI handlers handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_nmi() and
> handle_fasteoi_nmi() added by commit 2dcf1fbcad35 ("genirq: Provide NMI
> handlers") do not update the interrupt counts. Due to that the NMI
> interrupt count does not show up correct
The NMI handlers handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_nmi() and
handle_fasteoi_nmi() added by commit 2dcf1fbcad35 ("genirq: Provide NMI
handlers") do not update the interrupt counts. Due to that the NMI
interrupt count does not show up correctly in /proc/interrupts.
Update the functions to fix this. With t
5 matches
Mail list logo