On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:44:11PM +0300, Timofey Titovets wrote:
> 2014-08-24 8:41 GMT+03:00 Brian Norris :
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> > @@ -2320,26 +2320,26 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct
> > scrub_ctx *sctx,
> > do_div(nstripes, map->st
2014-08-24 8:41 GMT+03:00 Brian Norris :
> It looks like this intended to be 64-bit arithmetic, but it's actually
> performed as 32-bit. Fix that. (Note that 'increment' was being
> initialized twice, so this patch removes one of those.)
>
> Caught by Coverity Scan (CID 1201422).
>
> Signed-off-by:
It looks like this intended to be 64-bit arithmetic, but it's actually
performed as 32-bit. Fix that. (Note that 'increment' was being
initialized twice, so this patch removes one of those.)
Caught by Coverity Scan (CID 1201422).
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris
---
Untested
fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 12
3 matches
Mail list logo