Re: [PATCH] fs/affs: Fix basic permission bits to actually work

2020-09-25 Thread Max Staudt
On 9/25/20 12:07 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Has there already been any progress on reviewing this? It has already been merged, and the maintainers have been so kind as to backport it to all maintained stable branches. Thanks for your help, everyone! Max

Re: [PATCH] fs/affs: Fix basic permission bits to actually work

2020-09-25 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Max! On 8/27/20 5:49 PM, Max Staudt wrote: > The basic permission bits (protection bits in AmigaOS) have been broken > in Linux' affs - it would only set bits, but never delete them. > Also, contrary to the documentation, the Archived bit was not handled. > > Let's fix this for good, and set t

Re: [PATCH] fs/affs: Fix basic permission bits to actually work

2020-08-31 Thread David Sterba
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 05:49:00PM +0200, Max Staudt wrote: > The basic permission bits (protection bits in AmigaOS) have been broken > in Linux' affs - it would only set bits, but never delete them. > Also, contrary to the documentation, the Archived bit was not handled. > > Let's fix this for go

[PATCH] fs/affs: Fix basic permission bits to actually work

2020-08-27 Thread Max Staudt
The basic permission bits (protection bits in AmigaOS) have been broken in Linux' affs - it would only set bits, but never delete them. Also, contrary to the documentation, the Archived bit was not handled. Let's fix this for good, and set the bits such that Linux and classic AmigaOS can coexist i

Re: [PATCH] fs/affs: Fix basic permission bits to actually work

2020-08-27 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Max! On 8/27/20 5:49 PM, Max Staudt wrote: > The basic permission bits (protection bits in AmigaOS) have been broken > in Linux' affs - it would only set bits, but never delete them. > Also, contrary to the documentation, the Archived bit was not handled. > > Let's fix this for good, and set t