Re: drop it ?(Re: [PATCH] fixup binutils printing from scripts/ver_linux)

2007-07-09 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Jul 9 2007 12:20, Oleg Verych wrote: > >> Dumb, but better solution: drop that crap, called ver_linux. >> Know you have many distros, so be happy with any one, and forget about >> black old days of finding toolchain, that can actually build the kernel. > >#v+ >echo 'If some fields are empty or

Re: drop it ?(Re: [PATCH] fixup binutils printing from scripts/ver_linux)

2007-07-09 Thread reduce the noise, read the list
> Dumb, but better solution: drop that crap, called ver_linux. > Know you have many distros, so be happy with any one, and forget about > black old days of finding toolchain, that can actually build the kernel. #v+ echo 'If some fields are empty or look unusual you may have an old version.' echo '

Re: [PATCH] fixup binutils printing from scripts/ver_linux

2007-07-09 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Jul 9 2007 13:39, Gabriel C wrote: > > Uhh :) Ok here an ugly one : > > $ ld -v | sed 's/.*version//;s/.*Binutils)//'|awk '{print $1}'|tr -d ' ' > 2.17.50.0.16.20070511 > > $ echo 'GNU ld version 2.17.50.0.5 20060927 (SUSE Linux)' | sed > 's/.*version//;s/.*Binutils)//'|awk '{print $1}'|tr -d '

drop it ?(Re: [PATCH] fixup binutils printing from scripts/ver_linux)

2007-07-09 Thread olecom
* Jan Engelhardt "Mon, 9 Jul 2007 12:41:54 +0200 (CEST)" > > On Jul 9 2007 04:39, Gabriel C wrote: >>> >>> NAK. It starts reporting here empty binutils field. >>> FWIW, >>> >>> $ ld -v >>> GNU ld version 2.16.1 >>> >> >> Well the format changed so now we have : >> >> $ ld -v >> GNU ld (Linux/GNU

Re: [PATCH] fixup binutils printing from scripts/ver_linux

2007-07-09 Thread Gabriel C
Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Jul 9 2007 04:39, Gabriel C wrote: NAK. It starts reporting here empty binutils field. FWIW, $ ld -v GNU ld version 2.16.1 Well the format changed so now we have : $ ld -v GNU ld (Linux/GNU Binutils) 2.17.50.0.16.20070511 Adding to the collection:

Re: [PATCH] fixup binutils printing from scripts/ver_linux

2007-07-09 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Jul 9 2007 04:39, Gabriel C wrote: >> >> NAK. It starts reporting here empty binutils field. >> FWIW, >> >> $ ld -v >> GNU ld version 2.16.1 >> > > Well the format changed so now we have : > > $ ld -v > GNU ld (Linux/GNU Binutils) 2.17.50.0.16.20070511 Adding to the collection: 12:39 ichi:~

Re: [PATCH] fixup binutils printing from scripts/ver_linux

2007-07-08 Thread Gabriel C
Alexey Dobriyan wrote: On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 01:47:58AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: I just found that scripts/ver_linux does not print the binutils version properly on my Slackware 12.0 system. --- a/scripts/ver_linux +++ b/scripts/ver_linux @@ -21,9 +21,8 @@ gcc --version 2>&1| gr

Re: [PATCH] fixup binutils printing from scripts/ver_linux

2007-07-08 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 01:47:58AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > I just found that scripts/ver_linux does not print the binutils version > properly on my Slackware 12.0 system. > --- a/scripts/ver_linux > +++ b/scripts/ver_linux > @@ -21,9 +21,8 @@ gcc --version 2>&1| grep gcc | awk \ > make --ver

[PATCH] fixup binutils printing from scripts/ver_linux

2007-07-08 Thread Jesper Juhl
I just found that scripts/ver_linux does not print the binutils version properly on my Slackware 12.0 system. The following patch fixes things up. Pre this patch: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/kernel/linux-2.6$ scripts/ver_linux ... binutils Binutils ... Post this patch: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~