Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[dropped perfmon list because gmane messed it up and it's apparently
closed anyways]
> Is there any way to just provide a basic framework that everyone can
> agree on and then add on more stuff as time goes on? Do we have to have
> every different processor/ar
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 12:06:27PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 16:34:54 -0800
> Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Here's a patch against my current tree that gets the perfmon code
> > building and hopefully working.
>
> Unfortunately I still haven't merged perfmon due
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 16:34:54 -0800
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a patch against my current tree that gets the perfmon code
> building and hopefully working.
Unfortunately I still haven't merged perfmon due to recently-occurring
minor conflicts with Tony's ia64 tree and more major re
Greg,
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:53:20AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Also, a lot of your per-cpu sysfs files should probably move to debugfs
> > > as they are for debugging only, right? No need to clutter up sysfs with
> > > them when only the very few perfmon developers would be needing access
>
Greg,
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:53:20AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > > Do you want me to send you patches based on this tree to help clean up
> > > the sysfs usage now that it's documented?
> > >
> > Yes, send me the patches. But from what you were saying earlier it seems
> > I would need an
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:57:42AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Greg,
>
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:47:47AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 05:42:55AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > > Greg,
> > >
> > > Perfmon sysfs document has been updated following your adivce.
> > >
Greg,
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:47:47AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 05:42:55AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > Greg,
> >
> > Perfmon sysfs document has been updated following your adivce.
> > you can check out in my perfmon tree the following commit:
> >
> > e83278f8
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 05:42:55AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Greg,
>
> Perfmon sysfs document has been updated following your adivce.
> you can check out in my perfmon tree the following commit:
>
> e83278f879e52ecee025effe9ad509fd51e4a516
Thanks, that looks a lot better.
Do you w
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:08:20AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 05:42:55AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > Greg,
> >
> > Perfmon sysfs document has been updated following your adivce.
> > you can check out in my perfmon tree the following commit:
> >
> > e83278f879e52ec
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:33:13AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 09:08:20 -0800 Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 05:42:55AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > > Greg,
> > >
> > > Perfmon sysfs document has been updated following your adivce.
> > >
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 09:08:20 -0800 Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 05:42:55AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > Greg,
> >
> > Perfmon sysfs document has been updated following your adivce.
> > you can check out in my perfmon tree the following commit:
> >
> > e
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 02:34:49AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Greg,
>
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 04:34:54PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > Here's a patch against my current tree that gets the perfmon code
> > building and hopefully working.
> >
> Thanks for your quick help.
>
> > Note, it needs
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 05:42:55AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Greg,
>
> Perfmon sysfs document has been updated following your adivce.
> you can check out in my perfmon tree the following commit:
>
> e83278f879e52ecee025effe9ad509fd51e4a516
Where is this git tree located? On git.ke
Greg,
Perfmon sysfs document has been updated following your adivce.
you can check out in my perfmon tree the following commit:
e83278f879e52ecee025effe9ad509fd51e4a516
Thanks.
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 04:34:54PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Here's a patch against my current tree that gets t
Greg,
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 04:34:54PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Here's a patch against my current tree that gets the perfmon code
> building and hopefully working.
>
Thanks for your quick help.
> Note, it needs the kobject_create_and_register() patch which is in my
> tree, but I do not think it
Here's a patch against my current tree that gets the perfmon code
building and hopefully working.
Note, it needs the kobject_create_and_register() patch which is in my
tree, but I do not think it made it to -mm yet. The next -mm cycle
should have it.
Also, the sysfs usage in the perfmon code is
16 matches
Mail list logo
