Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2 Oct 2000, Christoph Rohland wrote:
>
> > the shm swapping still kills the machine(8GB mem) the machine
> > with somthing like '__alloc_pages failed order 0'.
> >
> > When I do the same stresstest with mmaped file in ext2 the
> > machine runs fine
On 2 Oct 2000, Christoph Rohland wrote:
> the shm swapping still kills the machine(8GB mem) the machine
> with somthing like '__alloc_pages failed order 0'.
>
> When I do the same stresstest with mmaped file in ext2 the
> machine runs fine but the processes do not do anything and
> vmstat/ps loc
Hi Rik,
the shm swapping still kills the machine(8GB mem) the machine with
somthing like '__alloc_pages failed order 0'.
When I do the same stresstest with mmaped file in ext2 the machine
runs fine but the processes do not do anything and vmstat/ps lock up
on these processes.
Greetings
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 12:42:47AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > --- linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/fs/buffer.c.orig Sat Sep 30 18:09:18 2000
> > +++ linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/fs/buffer.c Mon Oct 2 00:19:41 2000
> > @@ -706,7 +706,9 @@
> > static void ref
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 12:42:47AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> --- linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/fs/buffer.c.orig Sat Sep 30 18:09:18 2000
> +++ linux-2.4.0-test9-pre7/fs/buffer.cMon Oct 2 00:19:41 2000
> @@ -706,7 +706,9 @@
> static void refill_freelist(int size)
> {
> if (!grow
Hi,
The attached patch seems to fix all the reported deadlock
problems with the new VM. Basically they could be grouped
into 2 categories:
1) __GFP_IO related locking issues
2) something sleeps on a free/clean/inactive page goal
that isn't worked towards
The patch has survived some heavy str
6 matches
Mail list logo
