On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, Joe Perches wrote:
> diff --git a/scripts/get_maintainer.pl b/scripts/get_maintainer.pl
> index 9c3986f..ef05ed6 100755
> --- a/scripts/get_maintainer.pl
> +++ b/scripts/get_maintainer.pl
> @@ -483,6 +483,13 @@ my %deduplicate_address_hash = ();
>
> my @maintainers = get_ma
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 02:27 -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > > > get_maintainer's default output should answer the question "who do I
> > > > email about this file", and that ain't working :(
> >
> > Complaints cheerfully ignored.
> > Suggestions gratef
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > get_maintainer's default output should answer the question "who do I
> > > email about this file", and that ain't working :(
>
> Complaints cheerfully ignored.
> Suggestions gratefully accepted.
>
> Files that haven't had changes in a long time
> gen
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 14:45 -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/firmware/google/Kconfig
> > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
> > >
> > > I wonder why he's not listed as a recipient for patches from
>
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/firmware/google/Kconfig
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
> >
> > I wonder why he's not listed as a recipient for patches from
> > get_maintainer.pl since it's clearly obvious he wrote the entire fi
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:36:55 -0800 (PST) David Rientjes
wrote:
> $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/firmware/google/Kconfig
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
>
> I wonder why he's not listed as a recipient for patches from
> get_maintainer.pl since it's clearly obvious he wrote
On 23 January 2014 22:40, Mike Waychison wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:36 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>
>>> The GOOGLE_SMI Kconfig symbol depends on DMI and selects EFI. This
>>> causes problems on other archs when introducing DMI support that
>>>
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:36 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
>> The GOOGLE_SMI Kconfig symbol depends on DMI and selects EFI. This
>> causes problems on other archs when introducing DMI support that
>> depends on EFI, as it results in a recursive dependency
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> The GOOGLE_SMI Kconfig symbol depends on DMI and selects EFI. This
> causes problems on other archs when introducing DMI support that
> depends on EFI, as it results in a recursive dependency:
>
> arch/arm/Kconfig:1845:error: recursive dependency detec
The GOOGLE_SMI Kconfig symbol depends on DMI and selects EFI. This
causes problems on other archs when introducing DMI support that
depends on EFI, as it results in a recursive dependency:
arch/arm/Kconfig:1845:error: recursive dependency detected!
arch/arm/Kconfig:1845: symbol DMI depends on EFI
10 matches
Mail list logo
