On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 01:14:09PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-09-14 at 00:48 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:23:18PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 15:34 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 22:13 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote
On Sun, 2014-09-14 at 00:48 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:23:18PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 15:34 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 22:13 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 08:25:17PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote
On Sun, 2014-09-14 at 00:38 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:34:48PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 22:13 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 08:25:17PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 22:37 -0700, Jaegeuk
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:23:18PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 15:34 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 22:13 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 08:25:17PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 22:37 -0700, Jaegeuk
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:34:48PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 22:13 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 08:25:17PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 22:37 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:08:32PM +0800, hu
On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 15:34 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 22:13 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 08:25:17PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 22:37 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:08:32PM +0800, huang yin
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 22:13 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 08:25:17PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 22:37 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:08:32PM +0800, huang ying wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Jaegeuk Kim
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 08:25:17PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 22:37 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:08:32PM +0800, huang ying wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 07:31:49PM +0800,
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Fix recover when nid of non-inode
> > dnode < nid of inode
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:08:32PM +0800, huang ying wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tu
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 22:37 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:08:32PM +0800, huang ying wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 07:31:49PM +0800, huang ying wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Jaegeuk Kim w
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 1:37 PM
> To: huang ying
> Cc: linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net; LKML; Huang Ying
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Fix recover when nid of non-inode
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:08:32PM +0800, huang ying wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 07:31:49PM +0800, huang ying wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 0
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 07:31:49PM +0800, huang ying wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 01:39:30PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 22:23 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > Hi Huang,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 01:39:30PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 22:23 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Huang,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 07:38:26PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > > For fsync, if the nid of a non-inode dnode < nid of inode and the
> > > inode is not chec
On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 22:23 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Huang,
>
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 07:38:26PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > For fsync, if the nid of a non-inode dnode < nid of inode and the
> > inode is not checkpointed. The non-inode dnode may be written before
> > inode. So in find_f
Hi Huang,
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 07:38:26PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> For fsync, if the nid of a non-inode dnode < nid of inode and the
> inode is not checkpointed. The non-inode dnode may be written before
> inode. So in find_fsync_dnodes, f2fs_iget will fail, cause the
> recovery fail.
>
>
For fsync, if the nid of a non-inode dnode < nid of inode and the
inode is not checkpointed. The non-inode dnode may be written before
inode. So in find_fsync_dnodes, f2fs_iget will fail, cause the
recovery fail.
Usually, inode will be allocated before non-inode dnode, so the nid of
inode < nid
17 matches
Mail list logo