On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 00:16:59 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 02:25:53 +
> Al Viro wrote:
>
> > Umm... Is there any reason not to use simple_recursive_removal() there?
>
> Hmm, I may be able to (I'm still a newbie with understanding of the vfs).
>
> I did it this way thi
On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 02:25:53 +
Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 02:47:03PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
> >
> > Looking at how dentry is removed via the tracefs system, I found that
> > eventfs does not do everything that it did under tracefs. The
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 02:47:03PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
>
> Looking at how dentry is removed via the tracefs system, I found that
> eventfs does not do everything that it did under tracefs. The tracefs
> removal of a dentry calls simple_recursive_removal(
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
Looking at how dentry is removed via the tracefs system, I found that
eventfs does not do everything that it did under tracefs. The tracefs
removal of a dentry calls simple_recursive_removal() that does a lot more
than a simple d_invalidate().
Have the same done o
4 matches
Mail list logo