On Friday 07 June 2013 12:37:24 Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> On 06/07/2013 04:13 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>> I wonder if it would be better to name the directory "synopsys" or
> >>> "designware" rather than "arc" now. Is there a chance that the same
> >>> controller is used on non-arc CPUs?
> >>
> >>
On 06/07/2013 04:13 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> I wonder if it would be better to name the directory "synopsys" or
>>> "designware" rather than "arc" now. Is there a chance that the same
>>> controller is used on non-arc CPUs?
>>
>> The thing is - "arc_emac" is a custom ARC's (that was implemented
On Friday 07 June 2013 10:42:28 Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> On 06/07/2013 12:47 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I wonder if it would be better to name the directory "synopsys" or
> > "designware" rather than "arc" now. Is there a chance that the same
> > controller is used on non-arc CPUs?
>
> The thing
On 06/07/2013 12:47 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 June 2013 16:21:50 Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>
>> drivers/net/ethernet/Kconfig |1 +
>> drivers/net/ethernet/Makefile|1 +
>> drivers/net/ethernet/arc/Kconfig | 29 +
>> drivers/net/ethernet/arc/
On Tuesday 04 June 2013 16:21:50 Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> drivers/net/ethernet/Kconfig |1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/Makefile|1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/arc/Kconfig | 29 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/arc/Makefile|6 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/arc/arc
From: Alexey Brodkin
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:21:50 +0400
> +{
> + struct arc_emac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(net_dev);
> + struct phy_device *phydev = priv->phy_dev;
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + int status_change = 0;
Do not add empty lines amongst the top-level variable declarations
of a
Driver for non-standard on-chip ethernet device ARC EMAC 10/100,
instantiated in some legacy ARC (Synopsys) FPGA Boards such as
ARCAngel4/ML50x.
This is based off of current Linus tree, build tested for x86.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin
Reviewed-by: Vineet Gupta
Reviewed-by: Mischa Jonker
Cc
7 matches
Mail list logo
