On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 07:06, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
>
> Hi Ard,
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 11:07 AM Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 12:38 AM Ard Biesheuvel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 06:49, Masahiro Yamada
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Fe
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 12:38 AM Ard Biesheuvel
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 06:49, Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:26 PM Ard Biesheuvel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 04:45, Masahiro Yamada
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It took me a while to unders
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 06:49, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:26 PM Ard Biesheuvel
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 04:45, Masahiro Yamada
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > It took me a while to understand what is going on in the nested
> > > if-blocks.
> > >
> > > Simplify it b
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:26 PM Ard Biesheuvel
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 04:45, Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
> >
> > It took me a while to understand what is going on in the nested
> > if-blocks.
> >
> > Simplify it by removing unneeded code.
> >
> > - if_changed automatically adds 'set -e'
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 04:45, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
>
> It took me a while to understand what is going on in the nested
> if-blocks.
>
> Simplify it by removing unneeded code.
>
> - if_changed automatically adds 'set -e', so any failure in the
> series of commands makes it immediately fail
It took me a while to understand what is going on in the nested
if-blocks.
Simplify it by removing unneeded code.
- if_changed automatically adds 'set -e', so any failure in the
series of commands makes it immediately fail as a whole.
So, the outer if block is entirely redundant.
- S
6 matches
Mail list logo
